ChrisMaverick dotcom

on presidential candidates…

took the Select Smart presidential candidate quiz just for the hell of it. Apparently I should vote for the Socialists this year.

1. Your ideal theoretical candidate.   (100%)  
2. Socialist Candidate   (67%)  
3. Dean, Gov. Howard, VT – Democrat   (65%)  
4. Clark, Retired General Wesley K., AR – Democrat   (65%)  
5. Gephardt, Rep. Dick, MO – Democrat   (64%)  
6. Sharpton, Reverend Al – Democrat   (62%)  
7. Moseley-Braun, Former Senator Carol, IL – Democrat   (61%)  
8. Edwards, Senator John, NC – Democrat   (55%)  
9. Kucinich, Rep. Dennis, OH – Democrat   (53%)  
10. Kerry, Senator John, MA – Democrat   (50%)  
11. Libertarian Candidate   (44%)  
12. Lieberman, Senator Joe, CT – Democrat   (41%)  
13. LaRouche, Lyndon H. Jr. – Democrat   (29%)  
14. Phillips, Howard – Constitution   (28%)  
15. Bush, President George W. – Republican   (18%)  

om

7 comments for “on presidential candidates…

  1. January 14, 2004 at 10:01 am

    My results were pretty similar to yours… Sharpton above Dean, though.

    1. mav
      January 14, 2004 at 10:08 am

      well, I’m thinking the 3% difference I’ve got between Dean, Clark, Gephart and Sharpton has got to be considered margin of error for the “highly scientific” web poll…

      1. January 14, 2004 at 10:20 am

        (My results:)

        1. Your ideal theoretical candidate. (100%)
        2. Sharpton, Reverend Al – Democrat (79%)
        3. Moseley-Braun, Former Senator Carol, IL – Democrat (76%)
        4. Dean, Gov. Howard, VT – Democrat (76%)
        .
        .
        .

        Hunh. There’s the 3% margin of error again.

        1. mav
          January 14, 2004 at 10:52 am

          well, their politics aren’t all THAT different really.

  2. January 18, 2004 at 7:31 pm

    Wow. I knew I hated him, but I never would have guessed that I actually agree with Bush on 0% of the positions they ask about.

    1. mav
      January 18, 2004 at 8:51 pm

      wow… that’s pretty impressive… who was your top link?

  3. Anonymous
    January 6, 2005 at 12:13 am

Mentions

  • Anonymous
  • mav
  • wooble
  • mav
  • fizzbang
  • mav
  • monkey587

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)