I think the specifics there are spelled out in more detail in the Strauss thread.
Yes, you are correct. Specifically on the “kangaroo court” argument. Except as we sort of debate in that thread… that’s something that has to happen inside of the confines of a university. He set guidelines for how those proceedings should happen. One could argue they’re too strict. One could argue they’re not strict enough. One could argue (as Strauss is) that they de facto represent an illegal investigation of the accused outside of his constitutional rights (something i disagree with for reasons explained up there… but it’s a valid point).
Devos didn’t actually make ANY of these arguments.