That last thing anders said, is 100% correct, and I acknowledged it in a comment somewhere. (getting hard to keep track)

The idea of Title IX is discrimination. Not protection against assault. The Obama administration reinterpreted it to do something it clearly wasn’t designed for. And for a good reason.

But my issue here is Devos didn’t even address this as a misuse of executive power, where she might have had a point (and where a lot of people are arguing). She addressed it as unfair to the accused.