To clarify: my question was: how much of this guidance in that 2011 DCL was “made up” by the Obama administration versus previously existing (including from past administration). So, that includes things like post-Title IX Supreme Court rulings, previous federal regulations, etc. Unless the writer of that letter and all subsequent reviewers of that letter were on crack, because of their constant reference to Title IX, I got the distinct impression that the vast majority of the content of that letter, including the most volatile part to many, that Obama’s administration just made up the part about how an accused student is judged “guilty” within a university setting, was based on previously existing laws/rules/regulations/etc. So, I did some research and though the content of the original Title IX act is brief, there are tons of post-Title IX but pre-Obama clarifications/rules/regulations/etc.